Jump to content

Nippi

B Army
  • Content Count

    99
  • Posts on chatbox

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Nippi last won the day on March 9

Nippi had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

104 Neutral

2 Followers

About Nippi


  • User Group: B Army


  • Member ID: 7532


  • Rank: CRAZY


  • Post Count: 99


  • Post Ratio: 0.14


  • Total Rep: 104


  • Member Of The Days Won: 4


  • Joined: 08/26/2017


  • Been With Us For: 690 Days


  • Last Activity:


  • Currently:


Recent Profile Visitors

437 profile views
  1. I haven't expressed any thoughts about this yet, I've been watching everything play out before making any assumptions. Firstly, the whole "being held against her will" narrative is misleading and irritates me. Anyone who understands the mental health system knows that if a doctor or therapist determines you are a danger to yourself or to others, it is necessary to admit you against your wishes. Also, Britney was admitted to a facility, not a hospital, so it seems more likely that she agreed to go. These "#FreeBritney" stans are EMBARRASSING. The whole "protest" thing is absolutely comical. Nearly this whole entire protest is based off of conspiracies and not any verifiable facts. I have yet to see reliable sources for the statement her ex lawyer now made, any verifiable proof that Britney has tried to get out of the conservatorship, etc. If there are in fact Court docs or something of the sort that shows all of this, please enlighten me. All I'm saying is, Britney fans are really bad at citing sources. Britney's team, as per usual, is not helping the situation. While I don't believe the "cash cow" conspiracies, they have been really cryptic and shady. If it's true they used Jamie's illness as a cover-up, then that's just a mess. They should've said right off the bat that Britney wasn't mentally stable enough to continue the show, and that continuing in her condition could risk her health and compromise any contractual obligations. With Mariah Carey opening up about her bipolar disorder, I think it's time Britney opens up about whatever mental health issue she's struggling with, because hiding it from the press and keeping it under wraps only stigmatizes it more and leads to these conspiracies. The GP would most likely sympathize with her, and it will even help to make the reasons behind her breakdown more clear and understandable. Right now, her family either needs to come out and correct the record, or they should be investigated to be sure that Britney isn't being abused as these conspiracies claim. Until any of this happens however, the ridiculous "protests" and conspiracy theories started by fans needs to stop. Asking questions about the conservatorship, pressing her team and family to verify her well-being, etc is acceptable. Just not spreading unverified claims such as Jamie using the conservatorship to cash out on his daughter. I agree with most fans that the conservatorship needs to be reviewed. If she is deemed not well enough to be completely out of it, maybe there is a legal ultimatum that would grant her more freedom professionally, while still under the care she needs mentally and personally. Maybe she could be allowed more say in her professional career and finances, but Jamie could still reserve the rights to review her health, mental health, admit her to treatment if necessary, track and make sure she is taking her medications as prescribed, etc. And he should take a significant pay cut, to eliminate these "cash cow" rumors. He should be more than happy to help his daughter without being paid.
  2. He seems to be a very fresh and new name in music, this could be a good move. As far as the album goes, I want Britney to take as much time on it as she needs, and take as much time off as she needs to be with her family. I hope when she resumes working, she puts all she has into this album and delivers!
  3. So what if people think that? It's plausible that the show was cancelled for more than this. I think the user above me mispoke when they said "excuse", as if Britney was looking for a reason to cancel or something. There could be multiple reasons, but obviously Jamie's health scare is the most pressing reason. They also said they hope Jamie makes a full recovery, so I don't see the reason to call people disgusting over something so small. That's just my two cents. As long as we're all wishing Britney and her family well and Jamie a full recovery? There's no problem.
  4. So what if people think that? It's plausible that the show was cancelled for more than this. I think the user above me mispoke when they said "excuse", as if Britney was looking for a reason to cancel or something. There could be multiple reasons, but obviously Jamie's health scare is the most pressing reason. They also said they hope Jamie makes a full recovery, so I don't see the reason to call people disgusting over something so small. That's just my two cents. As long as we're all wishing Britney and her family well and Jamie a full recovery? There's no problem.
  5. Again, it's not that deep sis. Fans always speculate, and that's fine. Doing so isn't downplaying the severity of Jamie's condition. As I said, I'm sure all of us hope he makes a full recovery. You're acting like people are saying "oMg JaMiE RuInED DoMiNaTiOn!"
  6. No one knows what illness he has. And no one knows the reason(s) it was cancelled and/or whether it had to do with ticket sales or not. It's just speculation.
  7. Sis it's not that deep. We are all hoping Jamie makes a full recovery. There is no mean spirited thoughts here.
  8. I hope Jamie has a full recovery. I didn't expect this to be cancelled over family issues. I'm glad this was cancelled though, Britney should take some time to focus on family, and then new music, so she can come back strong and ready.
  9. I think it's very safe to say nobody wanted another Vegas residency. I was SO mad this was her "big announcement" after hyping it up on Ellen. Fans like me can't afford to travel and want to see her in our cities! I want a big tour again. And new music!
  10. I'm here for Mariah and Britney AND Xtina and Britney ... That would be too much legend for one album tbh
  11. Britney fans could talk ALL day about how bad BJ is and it's mostly because Britney OBVIOUSLY didn't have as much input as we were told! We got some GREAT tracks, Work Bitch is iconic, Perfume is fantastic... But then potentially great tracks like Alien and Passenger we're completely trashed in post production. Someone (I think it was on exhale) remixed alien and made the vocals sound MUCH better and made it far more listenable. Passenger's stems I know were floating around in 2013 but haven't leaked ... I wish someone would remix Passenger too and add more of Britney's parts. BJ should've been produced solely by William Orbit. I said before he's the only William that should've been on the album a William Orbit album would've been fantastic... Work Bitch should've been the most "dance" sounding song on the album. I think it should've been a primarily electropop album. Britney's Magnum Opus in Dance-pop is Femme Fatale (or Blackout, if you discount the edgier sound for pop.) BJ can't decide whether it's a dance or pop album or both. I wish this era was better for her, it clearly damaged her reputation more than it needed to be, and the producers and her team are mostly to blame.
  12. I understand that, I just don't see how it would be any more difficult than doing all of the copyright stuff for an album. No money would need to be invested for a physical release, no promo, appearances etc. I imagine it would be very easy.
  13. Wait, so most of the FF leaks were from a source that stole them? That makes total sense if they were stolen. Honestly charging people and PROFITING off of material that isn't yours is just more incriminating. I'm sure the source of those leaks was selling the material before it leaked. I honestly hate the way record companies deal with this. They don't give superfans ANY access at all to any unreleased tracks or stems, and then punish people who leak them to fans. (At least it seems that way.) I can understand the frustration when your new material leaks. It ruined the release of Madonna's Rebel Heart, and it probably suffered in sales because of it. It's completely understandable when it's new material. Labels, however, are missing out on a huge financial opportunity by barring the sale of stems and unreleased material. I mean, what are you seriously going to do with unreleased material and stems that are 10-20 years or more older now? All it's doing is sitting on a shelf or on a harddrive. Let's not forget that songwriters, producers, artists/musicians, studio time, engineers etc. all cost the label money. So why let that go to waste when there are fans that LOVE and want the unreleased material? Barbra Streisand did it with "Release Me" in 2012, and it has some great, memorable tracks on it, and plus, now you're getting revenue from that old, "wasted" material. With FLAC and lossless music nowadays, I'm starting not to care as much about physical releases, especially low-end ones, so that alone should save the label money. Carly Rae Jepsen is another example, I RAN when I heard about Emotion Side B. I never bought something so fast in my life. Fans WANT to buy this material, and by allowing fans access to buy, they're reducing the risk of it showing up on file sharing sites and also reducing the risk of hackers trying to find unreleased material. There are so many bsides and hard to find tracks I would love to buy that have been released, but aren't available in my country, another thing I don't understand. These sort of releases would not even need to cost much. They wouldn't have to spend anything promoting it aside from social media and a press release, because the fans will be the FIRST to know. I just don't understand it. I'm an avid music / audiophile, and so many of us are inside these fan groups and love hearing instrumentals, acapellas, stems and more. Labels are missing out.
  14. Not even that, but why don't traders share some of the exclusive content with the fans that WANT it? Fans that DEFINITELY would not leak and would enable them to trade with other Britney fans. That's the problem with "trading". It's an exclusive club and not many people are willing to give
  15. Honestly if Britney just put out an exclusive 20 year anniversary compilation of unreleased songs, this wouldn't be such a point of contention with fans. I would BUY an 8-12 track album of unreleased songs in a MILISECOND. Then we could all have the same songs. I really hate trading and wish there was a market for stems and outtakes. Labels would make alot of money.
×