Jump to content
  • Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal


Popular Content

Showing most liked content on 09/03/2017 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    I wouldn't call it over till Vegas ends Although the real era ended after Slumber Party, but I'm gonna officially call the end of the era once she does her last show in Vegas because that might be the last time she performs songs from Glory Honestly this is sad, but I think Britney is one of those artists where she doesn't create music for teens/kids now so they don't pay attention to her or buy her music. They think she's "old" because she debuted before their time For example, look at Joanne, Lady Gaga released John Wayne and the era ended and The Cure came out. Older artists (before 2009) are releasing about 2-3 singles from an album and then ending the era Which is sad to see because they're the reasons artists today exist. I hope she's going to release another for her BOMT debut cuz thats gonna slayyyyyyyy
  2. 3 points
    I kinda think she will release some random buzz single before the end of the year and before Vegas wrap-up leg, because I feel a very loooooooong hiatus is coming after Vegas ends.
  3. 2 points
  4. 2 points
  5. 2 points
  6. 2 points
    you keep rehashing this subject can we just move on from it?
  7. 1 point
    This! Because she released THIS year tour re-edition, so she can (re-)release everything what she wants from this album now
  8. 1 point
  9. 1 point
    There was really a chance for Blackout 2.0, but you know what..
  10. 1 point
  11. 1 point
    you're embarrassing
  12. 1 point
    My biggest issue with Britney Jean is the production. That's what screwed that album. Otherwise it's a solid pop album.
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
    Okay- In backwords - these tracks have the least number of works in the studio than other tracks
  15. 1 point
    MJ? Britney Jean? Are ya'll serious? Yeah maybe some of the vocals might have been replaced with a background vocalist because Britney didn't record it again but I believe it's a dumb assumption to say she didn't sing most of BJ. Besides, it's nothing weird to use a background vocalist over the lead now and then. Everyone does that and it happens even on Glory, like in Mood Ring for example. It's nothing bad or out of this world.
  16. 1 point
  17. 1 point
    Great question. I'm sure we all were wondering why they did this back in 2013 too but that was then, we're in 2017, let's move on. Also change the headline because I originally came in here thinking you were gonna talk about her performance with MJ from 2001.
  18. 1 point
    And b4 you jump back in. I'm not saying in I'm in love with the album or that I agree with what may have happened. All I'm saying is that i can understand that happening because she didnt have a lot of time for this record and usually when people rush two things at once one of them will suffer. Unfortunately this is the only blemish on her discography and she will have to accept that but it's not he worst thing that could have happened.
  19. 1 point
    NO like she recorded, the file got corrupted, the album has to go to press in 5 days, Britney can't come back in, this song has to be on the album, we'll use the background singer's backing take as the main take.
  20. 1 point
    My opinion is, like @btmyhbrit99 said, Britney is clearly present on every song.
  21. 1 point
    I think its because Britney is on all the songs. It seems like the mixing bumped up the background singer more to the level of the lead vocal and that if Britney' s vocals were completely missing at any point it was only for like one word, one run or something. That's not a very easy thing to prove, it's not a good article either PLUS NEWS FLASH Britney's not the only artists this happened to, it also happens with J.Lo and Rihanna IMO. So if they called Britney out they'd also have to mention them or it would seem like a witch hunt. Finally most music journalists know that Britney could sing (and she proved it with the glory album and her two random fully live performances this year) so they would lose credibility if they accused her of something that's not true. The real question is why did it happen during the BJ sessions. My theories have always been that she either ran out of time to fix up her mistakes in the studio because of POM, something happened to the original final takes when they went to mix and she didn't have time to correct it before the label wanted the album out, or she was extremely pissed at them changing the direction of the album last minute and out of protest refused to go back and pick up her vocals.
  22. 1 point
    No I'm not but do I think it's as bad as fans say it is? No. Fact is everyone was bopping to it until it underperformed then the rumors started.
  23. 1 point
    Because the press could get sued if they dare to say another girl is impersonating Britney on her record. Also you need proof to back up your story if you want some credibility as a journalist. But they called it, even though they didn't literally name it. I remember reading the reviews and everyone was saying that she "didn't sound like herself", or that "she was absent on her own record", or that "Britney's classic sound was lost within the production".
  24. 1 point
    Because it's a stupid assumption and conspiracy fans created.
  25. 1 point
  26. 1 point
    What does this list mean exactly?
  27. 1 point
    I feel kinda forgotten by you, even tho I always supported you and your projects...